E-Discovery. Solved.

LitSmart® E-Discovery is your partner in high stakes e-discovery matters. Our collaborative team of attorneys, paralegals, project managers and data analysts is dedicated to providing personalized solutions to your e-discovery, information governance and privacy needs throughout the world with a focus on security, defensibility, efficiency and controlling costs.

See Our Comprehensive Approach
See Our Comprehensive Approach

LitSmart E-Discovery

Don’t just litigate. LitSmart®! See how our award-winning team at LitSmart® leverages decades of experience in complex litigation, e-discovery and project management with best of breed technology in-house to provide comprehensive solutions that are superior to technology vendors or traditional law firms. Our team is the choice for savvy, streamlined and smart e-discovery.

  • Technology Competence
    Legal Updates

    What You Don’t Know Will Hurt You: Technology Competence in the Time of COVID-19

    Last fall, I had the pleasure of speaking on a panel at the 2019 Relativity Fest entitled “Why Lawyers SHOULD Be Luddites.” It was a lively discussion about whether lawyers should be luddites, whether robots would be taking attorney jobs, should attorneys learn to code, and how to future-proof yourself. Opinions were split but what struck me the most was that a majority - if not all – of the attendees wanted to learn how to future-proof themselves. In this blog I offer tips on how to take advantage of technologies to do just that.

  • Platform Mojo
    Technology Advantage

    Platform-Agnostic Search Mojo!

    Searching is a core e-discovery skill that has been a part of the legal case landscape for about two decades now. Throughout that time, the fundamental capabilities for keyword searching have not changed much. However, my experience has shown that crafting a good, effective search a core e-discovery technical (and artistic!) skill. This blog offers insight into how to do just that.

  • Shifting Costs
    Legal Updates

    Shifting Costs for Responding to Subpoenas Under FRCP 45

    Generally speaking, the presumption is that third parties will bear at least some of the costs of complying with proper subpoenas. That said, Courts often expect that a requesting party will negotiate in good faith the costs of compliance and, if those costs are significant, the requesting party would agree to cover at least some of the costs or limit its requests in light of the requirement of FRCP 45(d)(2)(B)(ii). As demonstrated by a recent case, though FRCP 45 provides two avenues for a third party to recover its costs for responding to a subpoena in federal litigation, such awards are the exception to the rule.