Technology Advantage

COVID-19 and E-Discovery- How Things Are Changing

Amy Catton April 28th, 2021
COVID

COVID-19 has changed the world we live in. People are working from home, students are attending classes online, and all group events are handled remotely. For those of us who work in the E-Discovery field things have changed also. While we are facing new challenges, we are also finding interesting new opportunities to conduct our work more efficiently, and everything we are learning will inform our work even after the pandemic is over. 

Remote Collection

While the rest of the world made a massive pivot to working remotely in response to the COVID-19, remote collection has been a staple in the E-Discovery wheelhouse for years. The advances in remote collection tools have enabled e-discovery professionals to do their work efficiently, significantly reducing the costs associated with travel time and expenses for clients. Thus, the e-discovery world did not have to reinvent itself in view of the pandemic, but simply ramp up its best practices for remote collection, which has now become the standard means of collection of data. Legal teams are becoming more adept at conducting remote collections using tools such as Encase and Harvester or enlist the services of an outside vendor. 

Even though remote collection solves many of the discovery issues brought on by the pandemic, there are certain problems it cannot solve. For example, many offices continue to be closed to employee access, rendering devices left at the office and paper documents inaccessible to collection. Collection of paper documents or physical devices may need to be deferred until a later time and litigation timelines may need to be adjusted to account for this reality.

Information Security and Preservation

As employees transitioned to a remote model, new preservation and security concerns popped up. These concerns may present challenges for a legal team responding to discovery requests. My colleague, Starling Underwood, wrote on this very topic in a blog you can find here. For example, employees may use tools that are not commonplace in the standard office environment for communications. Using communication methods such as text messages and other instant messaging programs require significant new considerations, including whether the information is distributed on multiple servers and/or controlled by third-party social-media companies. My colleague, Russ Beets, wrote about navigating social media retention and collection during e-discovery in his article, which you can find here. E-Discovery teams need to update their methods, protocols, and tools to manage the collection process from a diverse universe of communication systems that employees now realistically use.

The pandemic has also created work-from-home challenges for e-discovery teams themselves. Data Security is always of the upmost importance but now with more managed document reviews moving to a remote model and legal teams working remotely there are additional security concerns. While working from home, the legal team must take extra precautions to guard any confidential information – including from any family member who may walk by and see confidential information displayed on the monitor. Team members also have a variety of home internet systems with different levels of security. Therefore, it is imperative that legal teams accessing e-discovery materials are using VPN or Citrix technology to add another level of security and protect the confidential information entrusted to them. 

The Bright Side – Legal Teams Turn to E-Discovery Teams for Guidance

While COVID-19 created many challenges for the legal community in general and e-discovery in particular, it is also allowing for innovation and adaption. First, the pandemic is accelerating legal teams’ adoption of cutting-edge legal technology because they no longer have the luxury of requesting boxes of documents in hard copy. While working from home, team members must rely on technology to assist in the practice of law, and e-discovery professionals are finding a receptive audience from case team members for trainings on the relevant technology. In our firm, to avoid sending and receiving data via external media, such as hard drives, and alleviate the need for team members to be in the office to handle the media, we have been relying more and more on secure file sharing sites to receive and produce documents. We have noticed that more higher level attorneys, even counsel and partners, are interested in learning how to use Relativity. They are also interested in how we can use technology to support their cases and legal strategy in innovative ways, all while cutting costs. In fact, our team is using Relativity for projects, tracking and analysis far beyond the realm of e-discovery, and clients are taking notice. Indeed, legal teams are finding new ways to work and E-Discovery professionals are helping them lead the way.

Greater adoption of technology is also leading to more sticky relationships with clients. As legal teams are learning to be more creative with their workflows, they are turning to teams like ours to brainstorm about how they can streamline projects using the technology we already have in-house. Clients benefit from this creative mindset, especially when law firms are taking the “we are all in this together” approach, offering help beyond traditional legal advice to solve COVID-19-created needs. An example may be partnering with a large bank to develop a workflow to process small-business loans using existing review technology. It would not fit the mold of a typical review, yet meets the needs of the client in a unique way.

COVID-19 Aftershocks

New litigation is emerging in the wake of the pandemic, and it will likely be a major area of practice for years to come. Lawsuits have already been filed against secondary education institutions seeking refunds of spring-semester tuition because campuses were shut down. Clients who follow legislation closely are keenly interested in how the recent omnibus spending bills affect their businesses. We can also imagine future litigation related to COVID-19 including breach of contract, safety violations, negligence exposure, labor and employment, and business interruption, to name a few. In all these matters, e-discovery departments will play a key role in preserving, collecting, and processing information, applying the best practices they honed during the extraordinary period we are living through right now.

 

DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this blog is not intended as legal advice or as an opinion on specific facts. For more information about these issues, please contact the author(s) of this blog or your existing LitSmart contact. The invitation to contact the author is not to be construed as a solicitation for legal work. Any new attorney/client relationship will be confirmed in writing.

Topics: Covid-19 Document Collection E-Discovery E-Discovery Best Practices Data Security Relativity E-Discovery Technology Innovation LitSmart Information Security Data Preservation

Subscribe to the E-Discovery Newsletter

Related Posts

  • Data Mapping - Why is it Important for Successful E-Discovery?

    A data map is usually something that is generated along with a data retention plan and is a great starting point if and when an organization becomes involved in litigation and discovery. Long before litigation and discovery, however, it is important to understand the relevant data sources that may be in play and where those can be found within the organization’s various data systems. This blog explains what a data map is, what it contains and how it is helpful.

  • Pitfalls of Complex Search Protocols in ESI Agreements

    ESI Agreements cover the full gambit of e-discovery issues, from preservation expectations to production specifications. Sometimes, these agreements include an overview of the process by which the parties will identify the universe of potentially responsive documents by using specific date ranges, identifying priority custodians and developing proposed search terms. Adding another layer of complexity, this discussion is often had in a vacuum before the parties even know how much data their clients have. Coming up with criteria that identifies the relevant documents, but is not overly broad, in this vacuum can be difficult. However, the process is important because the date range, custodians and terms will inevitably dictate how much data is collected, processed and reviewed, which can significantly affect any litigation budget.

Newest Posts

  • When The Timing of Your Spoliation Motion Can Be As Important As Its Substance

    A motion for an adverse inference was denied in Pratt v. Robbins, et al. where Defendants failed to preserve or produce a video that might have contained pivotal evidence going to the heart Plaintiff’s civil rights claim for excessive force.  Plaintiff argued that Defendants spoliated evidence by failing to produce the video footage that may have recorded the use of force at issue.   A party seeking spoliation sanctions bears the burden of proving all of the elements of Rule 37(e), and under Fourth Circuit precedent is generally held to a clear and convincing standard. Plaintiff’s decision to suddenly cry foul on the eve of trial did not go over well with the Court.

  • PLAY IT AGAIN, SAM . . . BUT WAIT – WHAT IS HE PLAYING, AND WHO IS SAM?: Website Session Replay Software and Wiretapping

    The trend of class action cases alleging wiretap statute violations against website operators for the use of session replay software to collect information of website users continues to be a concern for companies in 2024.  While many of these cases have turned on whether website operators disclosed and obtained consent from website users prior to deploying any session replay software, a recent decision in a pending class action brought under the Pennsylvania Wiretap Act indicates that consent alone may not be the end of the story in these cases.

  • Utilizing E-Discovery Tools in Innovative Ways

    As part of the e-discovery process, we use digital means to identify relevant information for use in a legal proceeding. The proceeding may be a large-scale medical malpractice lawsuit, a patent infringement case, a government investigation, or countless other legal actions. However, the skills and resources used in those types of matters can also be used in other areas.